Hi Pedro,

plino wrote (24-06-11 02:03)
Cor Nouws wrote:

Plus - especially with the unfortunate experience from 3.4.0, and to do
something good for users, testers, marketing etc - IMO it is better that
in the end we have three weeks extra, than that we lack three days.
So I would really love to be on the save side ..


Thank you Cor for listening to the users instead of the "mighty schedule"

Well,  thanks for the complement .. :-)
But of course ... I don't think that it is the intention of the "mighty schedule" to hurt anyone or let alone the project :-) - we are all learning how this should work best for us. And that definitely will change over the months, years...

BTW since only Betas can be installed in parallel with the stable build
under Windows and that was not added to the 3.4.x branch (at least from my
understanding) I guess Windows Beta testers will have to wait for 3.5.x,
right?

Well, I don't see any betas coming for the 3.4.x branch, so whether is has been added or not, does not make sense. I only can point to my favourite page: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Installing_in_parallel

I hope that helps people to run more versions (early versions) on Windows too, so that it give them the opportunity to give feed back in an early stage. (Personal note: I really appreciate that I have not (or only seldom) to work with Windows any more. Public drawback: I cannot do serious testing there and already find it hard to understand, to follow the items going on Windows.)

Cheers,

--
 - Cor
 - http://nl.libreoffice.org

_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Reply via email to