Hi Michael, On 20 June 2011 16:02, Michael Meeks <michael.me...@novell.com> wrote: > On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 23:30 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote: >> Now I'm playing with makefiles and next week I want to merge >> some libraries. > > Heh - hopefully we can identify which libraries to merge there; then I > guess we will need to come up with a strategy for doing that cleanly - > particularly each dependent library & binary will need re-linking and > their Makefile's updating to reflect that I suppose. > So, I was thinking if it is possible just to do some magic like 'merge libX.so libY.so > libXY.so' and tell components X and Y to use libXY.so. But probably not or it's not clean solution. So we will stop creating lib(X|Y).so and in some Makefile just create one library from all the source files? And what if they are from different modules?
> So - we should do it with a couple of libraries first, and only after > some consensus is reached on how to do that - you're researching which > ones are best to merge now I think ? :-) > I'm sending list of libraries together with modules they belong to. Maybe I could try to merge framework ones? fwe and fwi shouldn't belong to UNO component. Just fwk, fwl, fwm. But only fwk is used 5 times. Matus
libraries
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
