On 4 June 2011 19:03, Matúš Kukan <matus.ku...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Now, I think I have a very little knowledge of how things work in KCachegrind. > And I started to doubt if it is possible to do what I thought should > be done. (maybe everything is possible but it may be too complicated) > I thought to hide a library we must: > - all it's functions mark as hidden (and set their cost to 0 or > something like that) > - add their cost to callers > But I think there are no special statistics from which function is > every part of the cost, so it's not possible to add cost to the > callers because we don't know how much for each caller. > I think in the beginning when the callgrind data are loaded it could > be possible. > But then there is no way to hide function, except loading data again > with keeping in mind some functions are hidden and that could be hard > to achieve. Or not. I'm waiting for your opinion. > > It is pretty possible that I am wrong but if not I'd rather let it be > because still you can view inclusive cost of each function and ignore > some libraries. > (I know it's not the same) > > Hope my mail (and thoughts) is understandable. > > Matus >
I'm sorry but I need to check if it's true what I've written. I found out the data could be present. So just ignore for now. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
