Sorry I cannot check, Ubuntu here...
2011/6/5 Chr. Rossmanith <chrrossman...@gmx.de>: > Hi, > > how many different compilers are used for Mac/Windows? Could we just try if > they accept the varargs syntax? Or is there more testing needed? > > Maybe there are more pieces of code which would be better readable if using > varargs? So if we know it for this situation we know it for future cases as > well... > > Christina > > Am 05.06.2011 17:49, schrieb Joop Kiefte: >> >> But are the implementations compatible? >> >> 2011/6/5 Norbert Thiebaud<nthieb...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 6:17 AM, Chr. Rossmanith<chrrossman...@gmx.de> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> any Mac or Windows opinions? >>> >>> according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variadic_macro >>> "The GNU Compiler Collection, since 3.0, C++Builder 2006 and Visual >>> Studio 2005 [1] support variable-argument macros, both when compiling >>> C and C++ code. In addition, GCC supports variadic macros when >>> compiling Objective-C. " >>> >>> So I'd say variadic macro support is not blocking this patch :-) >>> >>> Norbert >>> _______________________________________________ >>> LibreOffice mailing list >>> LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org >>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice >>> > > _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
