Hi *, On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Norbert Thiebaud <nthieb...@gmail.com> wrote: > [onegit] > > I have put what I have come-up with so far on our Wiki > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/One_Git_Conversion > [...] > Comments and suggestion are welcomed on the 'Discussion Page' > associated in the Wiki.
Hope it is not off-topic here as well (if it is, please tell and I'll just copy it to wiki discussion page) /* artwok */ is meant to not being merged. I think this is a bad choice, as you will always need it when building, and for the same reasons it is discussed not to be worthy to be merged, I'm all in favor of merging it: * changes very infrequently (thus no significant increase in history data, but even if it was: Does it matter whether you pull it into the one or into the other repository? So I don't understand the "only binaries" argument as supporting the idea to keeping it separate) * (mostly only) designers work on it. They have no use for git, be it a seperate repository or not. They don't need any history, the cannot use diffs on binaries anyway. A static tarball containing the content or just a webpage for browsing the icons is enough and better suited to satisfy them. ciao Christian _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
