On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 20:37 +0200, Julien Nabet wrote:
> Argh ! I had just missed this operator. I should have waited for the
> next day before sending this mail :-)
Heh :-)
> > Or did I miss something ? presumably another cppcheck false-positive
> > that needs filing& fixing (?).
>
> For the moment, it's hard to talk about false positive for cppcheck
> since we should use it by referencing all the include files. (I don't
> know how to do it quickly). Caolan had talked about it (i don't
> remember when precisely).
Oh - fun; hmm ... I wonder - could we not do it by substituting
cppcheck for the compiler, and pre-processing the whole file first - so
it was entirely self-contained ?
HTH,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
