Hi *, As the linux x86 build of the 3.4beta2 fails to start on many systems, but the x86_64 ones seem to work fine I wonder whether it is a problem with the build-environment of with the code.
So please: What is the system the beta builds were compiled on? Do the x86 builds work on /any/ system != the buildmachine? Does it start on the buildhost at all? If so: what are other builds lacking? It fails to start with: /opt/libreoffice/program/oosplash.bin: symbol lookup error: /opt/libreoffice/program/oosplash.bin: undefined symbol: sal_detail_initialize, version PRIVATE_1.1 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36275 affected Distros (at least) * Mandriva 2010.2 * Debian Lenny * Ubuntu 10.4 * Ubuntu 10.10 * Fedora 14 * Fedora 15 * Puppy (not sure what version, wasn't mentioned) There is no point in releaseing beta after beta when you cannot run it. For beta1 - OK; shit happens. But beta1 should have taught the lesson to do minimal sanity checks before releasing the builds/putting them on the mirror/announcing them. beta2: OK, might have been special distros only. beta3: Sorry, no mercy, no understanding why this happens yet again. ciao Christian _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
