Michael Meeks wrote: > FWIW - the bogus and over-granular threading approach in existing > LibreOffice code is something that needs beating to death. > LibreOffice threading: "inspired by the java synchronized" keyword is a > nightmare. > True - but:
> So - I'm with Kohei mostly - lets not do over-expensive, > non-inline-able nonsense atomic operations when we don't need to. > You need them. Until you've eliminated almost all of the above. Refcount races are *surely* much worse than the speed penalty of atomic counts. Cheers, -- Thorsten
pgp3IbJFt4Xcr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
