On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 04:36:03AM -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > I checked manually if the number was in the file. I didn't check > > further, as I don't know a way to do that. > > OK. I don't know of any clever direct way either, but using > http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/more/libs-core/svx/inc/svx/dialogs.hrc?full=RID_SVX_START++296 > and > http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/more/libs-core/svx/inc/svx/dialogs.hrc?full=RID_SVX_START++289 > I found that the RID_SVX_START+296 and RID_SVX_START+289 values apparently > already *are* taken. See > http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/libs-core/svx/inc/svx/dialogs.hrc#108 > and > http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/libs-core/svx/inc/svx/dialogs.hrc#188 . > Whether this overlap with your added RID_* values is a problem or not, I have > no idea, sorry. > > I hope some of our more clueful list members can enlighten us...
AFAIK this does not matter if the resources come from different resource files. E.g., if one uses CUI_RES(RID_FROBNICATE) in cui and SVX_RES(RID_KABOOZLE) in svx, different resources are returned even if RID_FROBNICATE and RID_KABOOZLE happen to have the same numeric value. (Marginal note: I have spotted at least one RID_ decl. in svx/inc/svx/dialogs.hrc (RID_SVXPAGE_MEASURE) that appears to be unused in svx and is defined in .src file in cui; the decl. should probably be moved there too.) D. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
