Hi Michael, On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:50:05 +0100 Michael Meeks <michael.me...@novell.com> wrote:
> Ooh - good point; do the java tests get skipped if we have > Java disabled ? [ a number of people build that way for speed / ease > ]. Not yet, but it would not be hard to implement. Although the subsequent c++ tests are currently only in sal (which has no Java tests). So you can pragmatically already run those with: make -sr subsequentcheck there. > Otherwise - great write-up; though personally I'd encourage > writing many more unit tests run during the build, rather than > subsequent-tests. And of course converting as many of our existing > C++ tests / workben fragments to similar unit-tests :-) That is not at all different from my position on unit tests at all really. I just think we should not dogmatically refuse to use subsequent tests where they are the pragmatic solution (because a real unit test is hard or fragile). And the five minutes to run all subsequent tests in headless mode now are not really any barrier at all. Best Regards, Bjoern -- https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
