On Friday 25 of March 2011, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 13:55 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote: > > It should be the current full list, with duplicates removed (i.e. once > > per every source of the problem, not once per every time it's reported). > > Why should it be that bad? > > argh!, I meant to say "then things are *not* too bad", not "*too* bad". > I mean that's far less that I would have feared, quite manageable.
Ok. In that case, if there are no objections, I'll commit my patches. -- Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
