On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 14:50 +0100, Theo van Klaveren wrote: > Hello again, > > More unit test hacking. Only the ones that work are enabled.
Looks good, pushed, thanks for these. > Some questions that are coming up: > > - Some unit tests contain .xsce files that seem to be used to tell > told the old unit testing framework that the test is expected to > segfault. This does not seem to work with cppunittester? Sounds sort of dubious to have tests that expect to segfault :-), crashes that are supposed to crash would be probably tricky to get cross platform friendly. I'm unconvinced that the .xsce files are useful to us. > - The math test fails in a way that is unexpected. The test checks > that double -> string -> double conversion works, and expects 1.#INF > to result in 1.#INF. The API docs agree, but the result is INF. Might have to poke back through the implementation of this and see what changes might have happened since the test was written to see if the code changed for a good reason or a bad one to see if its now a bug into impl+docs or a bug in the test. C. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice