* Michael Meeks <michael.me...@novell.com> schrieb: > Sure - and we are trying to fill out this niche; primarily by moving > (slowly) towards a split build [ in fact openSUSE does this already ], > whereby you can re-build and develop only one piece at a time - which is > quicker: ie. just re-compile 'writer'.
The clean answer is to actually split the whole monster into smaller packages, which can be built an deployed completely separately. Just had a look at the 'bootstrap' tree: it contains a full copy of dmake (even worse: with utogenerated files ;-o) - that would be my firt candidate for being kicked out. Generic buildtools should never be bundled into individual application's source trees. cu -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ phone: +49 36207 519931 email: weig...@metux.de mobile: +49 151 27565287 icq: 210169427 skype: nekrad666 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
