Thank you for your answers, for now we will alternate the author in the git patch files, but I will mostly send the mails to this mailing list. (And we now both have send a mail, confirming that all our patches are LGPLv3+/MPL)
Best regards Sören 2011/1/28 Norbert Thiebaud <nthieb...@gmail.com>: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:15 AM, Michael Meeks <michael.me...@novell.com> > wrote: >> >> On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 10:02 +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: >>> Well, we may need to adapt the tools computing the stats and credits to >>> take this into account. We will need to get all the names pretty easily >>> from git to get everyone properly thanked. Isn't the sign-off way the >>> best one? >> >> Signed off typically means, not "I also wrote this", but "I reviewed >> this, and I certify its origin" - I think we want to retain the latter >> meaning. >> >> So - I would be inclined to have some different way just for Soeren >> and >> his (thus far anonymous) friend ;-) either that - or we encourage them >> to alternate credits in their patches (which might be easier) :-) > > Yeah, I think alternate credit is probably the easiest route here. > > Norbert > >> >> HTH, >> >> Michael. >> >> -- >> michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LibreOffice mailing list >> LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice >> > _______________________________________________ > LibreOffice mailing list > LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice > _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
