Miklos Vajna píše v Pá 03. 12. 2010 v 17:38 +0100: > On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 11:34:13AM -0500, Kohei Yoshida <kyosh...@novell.com> > wrote: > > > It is enough? > > > > I can deal with it, but making it identical with the git tag would make > > it much easier. > > BTW, what is the reason the tag is LIBREOFFICE_3_3_0_1 instead of > libreoffice-3.3.0.1? IIRC cvs did not allow dots in tag names, but that > is not the case with git. Or is there any other reason?
Good questuion! We use the cvs naming scheme just from the historical reasons. I would not mind to use the libreoffice-3.3.0.1 variant. Best Regards, Petr _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
