Hi Norbert, On 2010-11-27 at 18:50 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> 18:25:23 shm_get kendy: I pushed a new branch: merging the work we did > on your branch + stuff the integrate with the build repo > 18:26:18 shm_get kendy: we I did not feel confident enough to push > directly to master... there are few migration path... not all > tested... and mishap on master would have crippled everybody for good > :-) > 18:26:51 shm_get kendy: branche name: feature/bootstrap-build > 18:27:31 shm_get s/branche/branch/ (forgive my franglish :-) ) :-) Thank you! I did some minor tweaks there, to exit 1 if post_download is not created, or if it fails, but works great :-) > 18:30:45 shm_get kendy: I still have to find a trick to trigger the > display of a message telling people that they HAVE to augogen/download > after the git pull that will bring these changes > 18:34:03 shm_get kendy: the idea is: in the build/download -> if clone > is here but not bootstrap => move clone/bootstrap to bootstrap and > clone to bootstrap/clone, then call a script that create the missing > link in bootstrap. if clone is not there (fresh clone of build) clone > bootstrap in bootstrap and then call bootstrap/g clone. either way > after that rawbuild = bootstrap So you propose to rename rawbuild to bootstrap, when the build-based method is used, right? As only the distro maintainers are the potential users for this, I am taking this to the ML; but I suppose nobody is going to be against that ;-) Thank you, Kendy _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
