On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 14:30 +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: > On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 12:47 +0000, Michael Meeks wrote: > > Quite; cf. such uncertainty - it probably makes considerable sense to > > look into a migration strategy from Java to (insert anything else). Some > > candidates might be python for the more scripty pieces (though I hate > > non-typed languages), and/or native C++. > > What about the existing Java extensions? Quite a lot of people are using > Java to either writer extensions or use UNO Java bridge from an external > application.
Its not, at least that's my understanding, about removing the java-uno bridge, or removing the *ability* to support Java. Its the thought to consider not defaulting to *require* Java for the built-in bits, which probably mostly boils down to defaulting base to a different backend for file based databases and a redo an occasional wizard here and there. C. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
