https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
Buovjaga <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|bibisectRequest |preBibisect
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |[email protected]
Version|3.5.4 release |3.4.0 release
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #19 from Buovjaga <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #18)
> Adding keyword 'bibisectRequest' to see whether this regression is already
> present in the oldest build of bibisect-43all repository or not.
> In case it's already present, change 'bibisectRequest' to 'preBibisect'.
> Otherwise, change 'bibisectRequest' to 'bibisected' and add a comment with
> the output from 'git bisect log'
Kitaets said this was already in 3.4, so changing to preBibisect
However, the problems described are gone. The thing described in point 5
already has its own report (something about making the OLE object frame look
better).
Arch Linux 64-bit
Version: 6.1.0.0.alpha1+
Build ID: 5956828c88501ef1366e60010b05053a8e1e642e
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 4.16; UI render: default; VCL: kde4;
Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); Calc: group
Built on May 23rd 2018
Version: 6.1.0.0.alpha1+ (x64)
Build ID: 8fae8a6cd73b7262c3739bd4acc5c72b54934ff1
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0; UI render: default;
TinderBox: Win-x86_64@42, Branch:master, Time: 2018-05-22_22:52:50
Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI); Calc: group
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
