https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108670
--- Comment #14 from Ekansh Jha <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Tamás Zolnai from comment #13)
> (In reply to Tamás Zolnai from comment #11)
> > (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #10)
> > > The active color shows how the object is defined currently. Meaning when
> > > you
> > > have a shape the #729fcf is effective and works properly. When you come
> > > from
> > > an undefined state, meaning no color or a different type of filling is
> > > set,
> > > it could indeed be crossed out and the RGB/Hex values could be cleared.
> > >
> > > Don't remember why this wasn't implemented correctly. Do you remember,
> > > Jay?
> >
> > I'm not sure any crossed-out thing is implemented anywhere in the code. Also
> > clearing the RGB/Hex values might be tricky, since this kind of number
> > fields always show someting. So from that point it's not an easy hack.
> >
> > @ Ekansh Jha, I suggest you to find another easy hack for hacking. I'll
> > remove this one from the easy hack list.
>
> @ Ekansh Jha: Sorry for that, I expected to have the same "No fill" behavior
Please don't be
> what we already have in other cases (e.g. character highlighting), but it's
> OK, if UX guys, want something different.
btw Thank you for informing early.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
