https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99212
--- Comment #5 from raal <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Terrence Enger from comment #4) Hello Terry, > Is this the same as bug 98729 I wonder? Both report crashes in the presence > of formulas, albeit in different applications, and both are fixed between > 5.1 and master. If the same, it adds to the importance of backporting the > fix to 5.1. really looks like a duplicate of bug 98729. @ [email protected]: please test with dev version to be sure it's fixed. > > @raal, > > Bug 98729 already has whiteboard "backportRequest:5.1". Do we need to do > anything futher? > >From QA perspective I think nothing else we can do. Bug 98729 comment 10, your reverse bibisect: source sha:c5bee7b8c1055e5052a261c8755bdb150fb27494 author Noel Grandin <[email protected]> 2016-03-15 09:05:07 (GMT) committer Noel Grandin <[email protected]> 2016-03-15 09:07:42 (GMT) commit c5bee7b8c1055e5052a261c8755bdb150fb27494 (patch) tree 1c1f5de891583f0430806ad18c2a3012cf646c88 parent 73443fd278811837650160482c34c15e8830f0d3 (diff) tdf#98600 and tdf#98622 fix metafile parsing look at bug 98622 -> target:5.1.3 => this bug is already backported to 5.1. So I think we're done and we can delete whiteboard "backportRequest:5.1 from bug 98729. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
