https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93514
--- Comment #10 from Norbert Thiebaud <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Rene Engelhard from comment #7) > yes, the NC part "non-commercial" is the exact point why this bug report was > opened in the first place and this thing is non-free. > > See http://opensource.org/osd-annotated, point 6 "You can not modify it or use for commercial purposes without the author's approval." can be read You (can not modify it) or (use for commercial purposes) without the author's approval. in fact it must be read that way as the other way: You can not (modify it or use) for commercial purposes without the author's approval. Does not make sens.. if you 'can not use it' for commercial purpose, surely you cannot 'modify it' for commercial purpose either. which makes it double non-free, cf point 3. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
