https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48416
--- Comment #24 from Tom Atkinson <[email protected]> --- > Could the > implementation of threads not be given a higher priority? It seems many > users would be grateful for it. Although it is wasteful, my ideal implementation would have the (foreground blocking) autosave interupted by any keystroke or mouse click and then immediately resume (start again a fresh) autosave transparently or little save indicator. Cos my encyclopaedia is taking 4 minutes (i know I should have migrated to some kind of flat file text file system like LATEX or Wikimedia. None of the load uses disk interestingly. Maybe I should select all copy paste into a clean document. I have a lot of footnotes. RAM COPY Then again, maybe the ideal is to be the most wasteful of all: do like a RAM copy of the book with 1 branch going to the user and the other doing a save and close. True background saving. Possibly saving CPU cycles for RAM doubling briefly. Crazy idea. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
