https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167250
--- Comment #12 from Michael Weghorn <[email protected]> --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #11) > E.g. why not Qt Widget [2], and reuse some of the kf6 implementation on win. As I've mentioned in the past, that would be the first thing I'd suggest to try as well, since Qt aims to integrate well with the platform and this would allow to reuse the existing qt6 VCL plugin without having to rewrite + maintain everything for yet another widget toolkit, and would also eventually give us UIA support on Windows (though it will require changes in assistive technology as well if they currently rely on IAccessible2). Qt provides OS-specific default styles, including one for Windows 11. (There's even an older WIP branch by jmux, `feature/qt5-win+mac` experimenting with using the Qt-based qt5 VCL plugin on Windows and macOS as well, but further work would surely be needed to make this "production ready".) @Sahil: Your tdf#164656 comment 8 says > I would be lying if I say "I don't want to go Qt", but people say Qt is bad, > really bad :). , but you haven't yet answered who says that (and why), so I think it's hard to take that as a serious "last word" disqualifying Qt from the start. (Of course, there may be reasons to not use Qt, but knowing which ones those are in practice would in my opinion be helpful in that case.) What icons to use is likely a separate question at least for the ones that LO provides. Depending on where this discussion is going, I think it might make sense to split single aspects into separate tickets. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
