https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166723
--- Comment #42 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Telesto from comment #40) > A) Bob inserts XYZ. Alice opposes (mental state), but wants to keep it for > further discussion. > > Manual steps: Alice accepts the change. Turns track changes ON. Deleted the > insertion from Bob > > Essence: Opposing against insertion implies rejection. So reject insertion, > but keep. It's not a full fledged rejection (yet). Baseline is changed. This scenario is one where "reinstate" would _not_ be used. That is because if Alice opposed the change, she would not introduce it into the baseline document. Introduction into the baseline document means that if there is no agreement on further changes - the change is final. So, in your example, Alice would either Reject (if she has the authority); or keep Bob's change as tracked, making a comment perhaps. I believe you are sharing the false assumption that tracked changes are eventually all accepted; they are not. When you are a single person working on a document, you could make that assumption, but once others are involved (and even more so, in a formal setting like contract negotiations) - you absolutely can't. (In reply to Lars Jødal from comment #41) > "Oppose change" could be a good choice. Lars, suppose someone sends you a letter asking you pay them a million dollars. Now, you send them the money, but also send a letter asking that they pay you a million dollars. Have you "opposed" the demand? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
