Doesn't make sense to set "has-treeinfo" property to TRUE by default
knowing that debian and ubuntu trees do not support treeinfo.
This was mistakenly added as part of commit eb53f8d6.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fiden...@redhat.com>
---
osinfo/osinfo_tree.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/osinfo/osinfo_tree.c b/osinfo/osinfo_tree.c
index 3a88da0..41e52d8 100644
--- a/osinfo/osinfo_tree.c
+++ b/osinfo/osinfo_tree.c
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ osinfo_tree_class_init(OsinfoTreeClass *klass)
pspec = g_param_spec_boolean("has-treeinfo",
"HasTreeinfo",
_("Whether the tree has treeinfo"),
- TRUE /* default value */,
+ FALSE /* default value */,
G_PARAM_READWRITE |
G_PARAM_STATIC_STRINGS);
g_object_class_install_property(g_klass, PROP_HAS_TREEINFO, pspec);
--
2.21.0
_______________________________________________
Libosinfo mailing list
Libosinfo@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
