On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 7:08 PM Christian Grothoff <groth...@gnunet.org> wrote:
> Sure, except for one thing: your clean up is not clean: on the "error:" > path, you do not "free(holder)", and on some of the "return MHD_NO" > paths you leak the entire response object. > > If you fix those minor nitpicks, this should make a nice example. > > Thanks & happy hacking! > > -Christian > Thanks for the code review! :-) Indeed, it would generate memory leak. I'm going to fix it and send the refactored example to the MHD trunk. Thank you very much! (y) -- Silvio Clécio
