On 03/25/2018 04:05 AM, silvioprog wrote: > Hello. > > I'm going to create a new project from scratch that uses MHD as main > HTTP library, so I'm free to choose a new API. However, I have some > questions that may help me to choose between microhttpd.h and microhttpd2.h: > > * can I use the new API in production? (I'm following MHD changes, but > I'm not sure about the new API development status)
No. It compiles, but there are chunks of code missing to even get the minimum things to work. > * will the previous API still receiving new features and updates? > (specially for websockets) If necessary, sure. I expect to maintain both APIs for years in parallel. > * is there a tutorial or reference to study the new API? (this two > documents of the previous API helped me a lot: 1 Not yet. > <https://www.gnu.org/software/libmicrohttpd/tutorial.html> / 2 > <https://www.gnu.org/software/libmicrohttpd/manual/libmicrohttpd.html>) > * is there examples or tests (even drafts) showing how to use the new API? Not yet. > I'm OK to study (and contribute) the new API and I'm inclined to choose > it because its simpler/friendly functions, MHD_Action etc., but if you > don't recommend to use it for while I'm happy using the current stable > API anyway. ;-) Always happy for contributions, and translating existing (old API) testcases, examples and documentation to 'new API' would definitively be a good starting point, but be aware that even if done correctly, the code could not yet possibly work.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
