On Montag, 9. Oktober 2017 19:30:39 CEST Christian Grothoff wrote: > On 10/09/2017 07:24 PM, Tim Rühsen wrote: > > Hi Christian, > > > > On Montag, 9. Oktober 2017 17:46:32 CEST Christian Grothoff wrote: > >> Hi Tim, > >> > >> We definitively don't have MHD_free() today. > >> > >> I'm not aware of any API call where MHD returns a pointer to the > >> application that the application is expected to free. > > > > MHD_basic_auth_get_username_password ? > > > > The docs say the pass and user should be free'd: > > > > 10.1 Using Basic Authentication > > > > Function: char * MHD_basic_auth_get_username_password (struct > > MHD_Connection *connection, char** password) > > Ah, yes, good point, I tend to forget about the auth APIs ;-). > > In that case, I guess it would make sense to add MHD_free(), unless > there is a better way?
No better way comes to my mind. Most C libraries have a similar function out of the same reason. It would be consistent to have it as well. Think of gnutls_free, idna_free, idn2_free, psl_free, ... Regards, Tim
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
