You can find cmake files for libmicrohttpd at https://github.com/sbellus/libmicrohttpd-cmake.
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Štefan Bellus <stevo.bel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok i will try to find time to finish configuration part of CMakeLists.txt > and add other target as well. > > Typed with thumbs. > > On Jul 20, 2017 2:57 PM, "Evgeny Grin" <k...@yandex.ru> wrote: > > On 20.07.2017 10:22, Štefan Bellus wrote: > > Sorry That I do no reply on mails, but I did not received any even if I > > am subscribed. > > I only noticed your reply in archive. > > Try to check "spam". > > >> By using CMake we could get rid of MSVC projects, but maintaining > > CMake is way harder then MSVC project in current state > > > > Yes. The benefit will be achieved only if you use only CMake. No > > autotools, MSVC projects. > > I convert the autotools to CMake to check if possible to replace it with > > CMake. > > I found out that it is possible. It take me 2 days to convert it. But it > > not waste of time. I learn how to configure sources in CMake and I learn > > also how autotools configure sources. > > I suggest you to put your result to some public repo. May be others will > find your CMake setup useful. > > >> What about meson? > > > > It is cool. The syntax is nice. They keep the idea of describing the > > build in general language and > > let the back-end (CMake or meson) to generate specific commands for > > underlying build systems. > > The syntax of this general language is much better in meson. > > I votes for meson :) > > I am little bit skeptic because more and more people start to use CMake > > nowadays. But meson is written in python and a lot of more people can > > use python as C/CPP (CMake is written in C/CPP) and contribute to meson. > > I guess if meson also introduce some package manager for C (something > > like Java maven repositories or C# Nuget) they will win. > > > > I am a maintainer of project that depends on your library. I would love > > if you can provide same build system on all platforms. It really make > > thinks easier. > > As I said, you can try to maintain your CMake configuration. If there > will be mass demand for CMake, we could come back to this question. > > > -- > Best Wishes, > Evgeny Grin > > >
