So if you are not using a thread pool, does that mean you are using a thread per connection? If so, what benefit does suspending a connection give you in that case, because you can just hold up the calling thread without a problem (it is dedicated to you anyway)? We haven't tested without a thread pool.
~Jared On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Luke-Jr <l...@dashjr.org> wrote: > On Wednesday, February 05, 2014 3:08:14 AM Jared Cantwell wrote: > > 1. After we receive some data in the access handler callback > > (*upload_data_size > 0) we decide whether we've buffered enough > internally, > > and if so, we call MHD_suspend_connection() > > > > We do not call this on the final callback with *upload_data_size == 0 > since > > we will not get another callback from mHTTPD > > Unfortunately, I want to read the entire upload buffer before I suspend. > Fortunately, this specific use case I'm trying to address would probably > not > fail too badly if I defer all reading until after the suspend/resume. > Therefore, I have modified my code to suspend during the initial call to > the > access handler callback (which also initialises *con_cls). > > > 2. In the background (on another thread), we process the data we have > > buffered. If the buffer shrinks enough, we call MHD_resume_connection() > > > > 3. We will get called back in the access handler after we resume, and we > > have also seen occasional callbacks while suspended, which we ignore; we > > keep track of our suspended state. > > Unfortunately, I am not seeing any callback after I call > MHD_resume_connection(). I do consistently get another callback immediately > after MHD_suspend_connection(), however... > > What do you return from the callback after you do MHD_suspend_connection? > If I > return MHD_NO, my connection gets closed, so I am returning MHD_YES for > now. > > > 4. We are running the server with these options: > > > > MHD_USE_SUSPEND_RESUME (which in turn implies > MHD_USE_PIPE_FOR_SHUTDOWN) > > MHD_USE_SELECT_INTERNALLY > > > > and we have passed in a value for MHD_OPTION_THREAD_POOL_SIZE to use a > > thread pool > > My only difference here is not using a thread pool. > > Luke >