Externally, we have been exposing the 64-bit opaque marker for each NBD packet as the "cookie", because it was less confusing when contrasted with our 'struct nbd_handle *' holding all libnbd state. It also avoids confusion between the noun 'handle' as a way to identify a packet and the verb 'handle' for reacting to things like signals. Upstream NBD changed their spec to favor the name "cookie" based on our recommendations[1], and so now we can get rid of our last uses of the old name.
[1] https://github.com/NetworkBlockDevice/nbd/commit/ca4392eb2b Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> --- lib/nbd-protocol.h | 6 +++--- generator/states-issue-command.c | 6 +++--- generator/states-reply-simple.c | 2 +- generator/states-reply.c | 4 ++-- 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/nbd-protocol.h b/lib/nbd-protocol.h index 0217891e..50275dcd 100644 --- a/lib/nbd-protocol.h +++ b/lib/nbd-protocol.h @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ struct nbd_request { uint32_t magic; /* NBD_REQUEST_MAGIC. */ uint16_t flags; /* Request flags. */ uint16_t type; /* Request type. */ - uint64_t handle; /* Opaque handle. */ + uint64_t cookie; /* Opaque handle. */ uint64_t offset; /* Request offset. */ uint32_t count; /* Request length. */ } NBD_ATTRIBUTE_PACKED; @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ struct nbd_request { struct nbd_simple_reply { uint32_t magic; /* NBD_SIMPLE_REPLY_MAGIC. */ uint32_t error; /* NBD_SUCCESS or one of NBD_E*. */ - uint64_t handle; /* Opaque handle. */ + uint64_t cookie; /* Opaque handle. */ } NBD_ATTRIBUTE_PACKED; /* Structured reply (server -> client). */ @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ struct nbd_structured_reply { uint32_t magic; /* NBD_STRUCTURED_REPLY_MAGIC. */ uint16_t flags; /* NBD_REPLY_FLAG_* */ uint16_t type; /* NBD_REPLY_TYPE_* */ - uint64_t handle; /* Opaque handle. */ + uint64_t cookie; /* Opaque handle. */ uint32_t length; /* Length of payload which follows. */ } NBD_ATTRIBUTE_PACKED; diff --git a/generator/states-issue-command.c b/generator/states-issue-command.c index 111e131c..30721946 100644 --- a/generator/states-issue-command.c +++ b/generator/states-issue-command.c @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ ISSUE_COMMAND.START: h->request.magic = htobe32 (NBD_REQUEST_MAGIC); h->request.flags = htobe16 (cmd->flags); h->request.type = htobe16 (cmd->type); - h->request.handle = htobe64 (cmd->cookie); + h->request.cookie = htobe64 (cmd->cookie); h->request.offset = htobe64 (cmd->offset); h->request.count = htobe32 (cmd->count); h->chunks_sent++; @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ ISSUE_COMMAND.PREPARE_WRITE_PAYLOAD: assert (h->cmds_to_issue != NULL); cmd = h->cmds_to_issue; - assert (cmd->cookie == be64toh (h->request.handle)); + assert (cmd->cookie == be64toh (h->request.cookie)); if (cmd->type == NBD_CMD_WRITE) { h->wbuf = cmd->data; h->wlen = cmd->count; @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ ISSUE_COMMAND.FINISH: assert (!h->wlen); assert (h->cmds_to_issue != NULL); cmd = h->cmds_to_issue; - assert (cmd->cookie == be64toh (h->request.handle)); + assert (cmd->cookie == be64toh (h->request.cookie)); h->cmds_to_issue = cmd->next; if (h->cmds_to_issue_tail == cmd) h->cmds_to_issue_tail = NULL; diff --git a/generator/states-reply-simple.c b/generator/states-reply-simple.c index 8fd9f62a..19be5418 100644 --- a/generator/states-reply-simple.c +++ b/generator/states-reply-simple.c @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ REPLY.SIMPLE_REPLY.START: if (error || h->structured_replies) SET_NEXT_STATE (%^FINISH_COMMAND); else { - uint64_t cookie = be64toh (h->sbuf.simple_reply.handle); + uint64_t cookie = be64toh (h->sbuf.simple_reply.cookie); SET_NEXT_STATE (%.DEAD); set_error (EPROTO, "no matching cookie %" PRIu64 " found for server reply, " diff --git a/generator/states-reply.c b/generator/states-reply.c index f7888154..511e5cb1 100644 --- a/generator/states-reply.c +++ b/generator/states-reply.c @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ REPLY.CHECK_SIMPLE_OR_STRUCTURED_REPLY: * handle (our cookie) is stored at the same offset. */ h->chunks_received++; - cookie = be64toh (h->sbuf.simple_reply.handle); + cookie = be64toh (h->sbuf.simple_reply.cookie); /* Find the command amongst the commands in flight. If the server sends * a reply for an unknown cookie, FINISH will diagnose that later. */ @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ REPLY.FINISH_COMMAND: /* NB: This works for both simple and structured replies because the * handle (our cookie) is stored at the same offset. */ - cookie = be64toh (h->sbuf.simple_reply.handle); + cookie = be64toh (h->sbuf.simple_reply.cookie); /* Find the command amongst the commands in flight. */ for (cmd = h->cmds_in_flight, prev_cmd = NULL; cmd != NULL; -- 2.40.1 _______________________________________________ Libguestfs mailing list Libguestfs@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
