On 4/14/23 10:43, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 10:21:31AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> In the strictest sense, I only need to shorten >> DESTINATION_IS_ZERO_OPTION by three characters. Should I rename it to >> DEST_IS_ZERO_OPTION, or TARGET_IS_ZERO_OPTION? (The latter is better, >> because we already have a "--target-is-zero" long option, aliasing >> "--destination-is-zero".) > > Or even fold it across a line ..?
I like the table format too much for that. :) > >> So I'd replace patches #1 and #2 with that, and keep #3 and #4. > > I think that's better. OK, I'll try with TARGET_IS_ZERO_OPTION then. Thanks! Laszlo _______________________________________________ Libguestfs mailing list Libguestfs@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
