On 2/22/23 10:09, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 09:48:04AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> So: if the libnbd project can tolerate my attitude (approach#2), then >> I'd like to proceed with this series (full scope), with me addressing >> the v3 review feedback in v4, and so on. If not, then I'll abandon the >> series, and try to make myself useful with something else -- where my >> basic stance, towards whatever documentation I read, need not be *distrust*. > > I'd definitely like to see further revisions of this series. > > Also, is there a subset of patches which have been reviewed and agreed > on by myself & Eric that we can push now? This will make the series > less formidable to review.
Yes, that's exactly what I've had in mind. There's an initial sub-sequence that should be pushable (with some further tasks noted in feedback that I should capture in BZs). Then, for the rest, now that we've all seen the full scope, I plan to advance in baby steps; effectively splitting the series for v4 into multiple small waves. This is a frequent problem with a long tail of dependencies. Initially, one is reluctant to post any "prelude" patches because there's no evidence yet that the larger series is going *anywhere*. There must be *some* path first that fully connects the start with the end. But, once that path exists, and the scope is agreed upon, we can iterate in smaller sprints. Thanks! Laszlo _______________________________________________ Libguestfs mailing list Libguestfs@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
