On Tuesday, 27 November 2018 12:17:52 CET Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 11:13:12AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 11:59:08AM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > > > We ship our own copy of it, so we do not need the external version. > > > (Also, the latest upstream version of ocaml-libvirt was already not > > > usable to build the test harness of v2v.) > > > > This is a significant step backwards from a Fedora packaging POV > > which expects maintainers to unbundle any 3rd party deps and use > > the external packages instead.
Yes, I already know what mean bundling stuff vs what a distro expects. > > Why can't we just do a new release of ocaml-libvirt upstream and > > put that into Fedora (and other distros that care) straightaway. See the commit message of patch #2, and the libvirt.README file added by that patch. Also: we have already a similar situation for ocaml-augeas, from mid-2017 even. > Also: I thought the agreed plan was to do an upstream release of > ocaml-libvirt, and then require it (as an external dependency) > starting with libguestfs 1.40? https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-September/msg00012.html This mentions delaying it after 1.40, which is OK (I posted here mostly to refresh it, especially after the upstream work on libvirt-ocaml), but not making it an external dependency. -- Pino Toscano
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Libguestfs mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
