On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Dan Kegel <d...@kegel.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Nick Mathewson <ni...@freehaven.net> wrote: >> For more background, folks should see >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation and >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CryptoConsolidationEval > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Nss_compat_ossl looks sweet.
Want to see whether Libevent passes its unit tests when using that? I'm curious, but won't have time to check for a while. > By the way, OpenSSL does not have a stable ABI; according to > http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-dev@openssl.org/msg23746.html, > each release has a new ABI. This is one of the reasons why > it's not part of the LSB. (I suppose this might have changed now > that OpenSSL's hit 1.0, but I rather doubt it.) I think they're trying to move towards a more stable ABI with the addition of OPENSSL_NO_SSL_INTERN in 1.0.1, but I bet it will take a while before they add enough accessor functions. -- Nick *********************************************************************** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@freehaven.net with unsubscribe libevent-users in the body.
