On 2010-09-09 17:28, Simon Perreault wrote: > Would this be the right fix?
Argh, git-send-email didn't do what I wanted it to do. Here's the patch in attachment. Sorry. Simon -- NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca vCard 4.0 --> http://www.vcarddav.org
>From 3cb5c4ce48a237c54d359baf92c31bef366c6d34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Perreault <simon.perrea...@viagenie.ca> Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 17:19:20 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Obey enabled status when unsuspending --- bufferevent.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/bufferevent.c b/bufferevent.c index cebce8c..789310a 100644 --- a/bufferevent.c +++ b/bufferevent.c @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ bufferevent_unsuspend_read(struct bufferevent *bufev, short what) EVUTIL_UPCAST(bufev, struct bufferevent_private, bev); BEV_LOCK(bufev); bufev_private->read_suspended &= ~what; - if (!bufev_private->read_suspended) + if (!bufev_private->read_suspended && (bufev->enabled & EV_READ)) bufev->be_ops->enable(bufev, EV_READ); BEV_UNLOCK(bufev); } @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ bufferevent_unsuspend_write(struct bufferevent *bufev, short what) EVUTIL_UPCAST(bufev, struct bufferevent_private, bev); BEV_LOCK(bufev); bufev_private->write_suspended &= ~what; - if (!bufev_private->write_suspended) + if (!bufev_private->write_suspended && (bufev->enabled & EV_WRITE)) bufev->be_ops->enable(bufev, EV_WRITE); BEV_UNLOCK(bufev); } -- 1.7.1
