Hello again, I have finally completed the leviathan task of my first gcc compilation and test.
I am encouraged to have only one unexpected failure outside libmudflap. This leaves me with two questions. 1. How bad is that error? I have inferred that it is probably infrequent - but it does no harm to check... (FAIL: g++.dg/asan/asan_test.C -O2 AddressSanitizer_HugeMallocTest Ident((char*)malloc(size))[-1] = 0 output pattern test, should match is located 1 bytes to the left of 2726297600-byte) 2. Far more worryingly - have I somehow mishandled the tests? I am drawn to startling disparity in the test totals. Here is my gcc summary, based on source tarballs downloaded in the past week or so: === gcc Summary === # of expected passes92870 # of expected failures259 # of unsupported tests1096 and here is the corresponding section from http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/build-logs/stable/core2duo/test-logs/080-gcc (which I believe ran in August): === gcc Summary === # of expected passes93302 # of expected failures261 # of unsupported tests1368 Am I correct in thinking that I am missing 706 tests? Has the test suite really shrunk by 700 tests in the past 8 weeks? Again, many thanks, R. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
