William Immendorf wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Bill Cunningham <bill...@suddenlink.net>
> wrote:
>> Â Â Ok. It's there. I have solved this problem. And another has arisen. I am
>> running an old RH 9 32 bit OS on a AMD athelon 64 bit address bus processor.
> (FYI: It's spelled Athlon, not Athelon.)
Your CDO is showing :-)
CDO is like OCD, but the letters are in the right order.
> The OS that you are using is not adquadate for building LFS 6.8. The
> book recommends a host system that is like or newer than LFS 6.3,
> which is dated around late 2007. Redhat 9 was released around 2003 or
> so, and that tells me right there that your host system is way too old
> to build on.
Since the C programming language is built upon a virtual machine
concept, and the sources for the tools are all written in C, AFAIK,
then what is the problem. Any machine which supports the necessary
constructs should be able to emit the code necessary. One should be
able to build for the PC using a MAC, ISTM.
What is the issue? Does the GCC have special "hooks" into the
kernel or sth like that?
Mac
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
