On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 07:42:40AM -0500, robert wrote: > I've reposted this ... previous post possibly lost with earlier similarly > titled > thread. > Hi Robert,
> -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: 6.16. GCC-4.5.2 > Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:36:04 -0500 > From: robert <[email protected]> > To: LFS Support List <[email protected]> > > This is disconcerting. While results seem to be "acceptable", the Error 1, > Error > 2 messages I don't like. Any comments? Should I proceed? fall back? I snipped out some of the details... > === libmudflap Summary === > > # of expected passes 1414 > # of unexpected failures 13 > === libgomp Summary === > > # of expected passes 1029 > > === g++ Summary === > > # of expected passes 22526 > # of expected failures 149 > # of unsupported tests 115 > > === gcc tests === > > > Running target unix > > === gcc Summary === > > # of expected passes 61949 > # of expected failures 166 > # of unsupported tests 542 > /sources/gcc-build/gcc/xgcc version 4.5.2 (GCC) > > > === libgomp Summary === > > # of expected passes 1029 > > === libmudflap Summary === > > # of expected passes 1414 > # of unexpected failures 13 > === libstdc++ tests === > > > Running target unix > > === libstdc++ Summary === > > # of expected passes 7075 > # of expected failures 95 > # of unsupported tests 339 For myself, I would proceed forward, especially if the number of failures is similar to the results others have gotten. I don't think I've ever seen the gcc testsuite return zero failures. > > [Requesting program interpreter: /lib/ld-linux.so.2] > > /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/../../../crt1.o succeeded > /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/../../../crti.o succeeded > /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/../../../crtn.o succeeded > > #include <...> search starts here: > /usr/local/include > /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/include > /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/include-fixed > /usr/include > > SEARCH_DIR("/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib") > SEARCH_DIR("/usr/local/lib") > SEARCH_DIR("/lib") > SEARCH_DIR("/usr/lib"); > > attempt to open /lib/libc.so.6 succeeded > found ld-linux.so.2 at /lib/ld-linux.so.2 Looks like your toolchain is set up properly. I would suggest that you carry on. Best of luck, ae -- My Blog: http://elian001.wordpress.com -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
