On vr, 2011-06-17 at 22:12 +0800, Webmaster wrote: > I never "check", because if the check passed it's useless but if the > check failed you can do nothing.
If the check passed you know you have succeeded thus far, if it failed you might have made a mistake. I'd rather _know_ something is wrong than trust my data to a system that might get hopelessly corrupted! > > > ------------------ Original ------------------ > From: "robert"<mullinrob...@gmail.com>; > Date: Fri, Jun 17, 2011 00:33 AM > To: "lfs-support"<lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org>; > > Subject: 6.9. Glibc-2.12.1 > > cannot get beyond this: > > make[1]: Target `check' not remade because of errors. > make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/glibc-2.12.1' > make: *** [check] Error 2 > make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored) > make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/rt/tst-mqueue5.out] Error 1 > make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/rt/tst-cpuclock2.out] Error 1 > make[1]: *** [rt/tests] Error 2 > make: *** [check] Error 2 > > > any suggestions? > > Thanks in advance. > > Robert > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
