On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 02:55 +0000, Face Man wrote: > checking whether ld is GNU ld... no > checking for > /tools/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.0/../../../../x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/as... > > /tools/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.0/../../../../x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/as > checking version of > /tools/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.5.0/../../../../x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/as... > 2.20.1.20100303, ok > checking for ld... ld > checking version of ld... v. ?.??, bad
This looks dodgy - something has clearly gone wrong at an earlier point in the build. ld is part of binutils, so the problem was probably with the installation of that package back in chapter 5. Does /tools/bin/ld even exist? Simon.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
