akhiezer wrote: > It's not a matter of the book failing to mention some enhancement > that's upstream in some later release or patch. To portray it as that, > is maybe viewing things not from the original issue (book says x is > installed whereas it isn't) but instead viewing from the ensuing > discussion (about tabs being in a patch or new version). > > Instead, it's a matter of the book saying that an item *is* installed, > when it *is not* installed. It's a factual error in the book. And I'd > say that'd normally constitute an erratum (or perhaps more properly a > corrigendum).
OK, I thought it was just in the -dev book. I can put up an errata item for 6.5. > Isn't there a post someplace that says such 'Contents of <pkgname>' > lists are generated automatically; will have a look. No. I wish. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
