On Sunday 30 November 2008 04:21:44 pm Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > Stealth wrote: > > On Sunday 30 November 2008 03:33:05 pm Wolfgang Messingschlager > > > > wrote: > >> Stealth wrote: > >>> On Sunday 30 November 2008 02:17:30 pm Herman Gerritsen wrote: > >>>>> gcc -dumpspecs | sed '[EMAIL PROTECTED]/lib/ld-linux.so.2@/tools&@g' \ > >>>>> > >>>>> > `dirname $(gcc -print-libgcc-file-name)`/specs > >>>>> > >>>>> and I get: > >>>>> > >>>>> sed: can't read /usr/lib/gcc/i486-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/specs: > >>>>> No such file or directory > > First off, do you understand what the PATH variable is doing? If > not, I suggest you google for the PATH environment variable and > take a quick read. > > Secondly, do you understand what the first pass of binutils and > gcc was for and where they should have been installed? Quick > hint, you should have /tools/bin/gcc and when you run just 'gcc' > your shell should be using /tools/bin/gcc, not /usr/bin/gcc. > > > PATH=/tools/bin:/bin:/usr/bin > > > >> which gcc > > > > 4.1.2 > > I think you misunderstood his suggestion. Type 'which gcc' to > find out the full path of gcc, the one that your shell is using > by default. If 'which gcc' spits out /usr/bin/gcc, then given > that your PATH variable is as you say above, quite likely you > don't have /tools/bin/gcc. A common mistake is to forget to type > 'make install' for the first pass of gcc. > > > to complete the path above it is: > > > > /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/gcc/specs > > This is not at all correct. Unless that you mean you dumped the > specs file to this location just so you could look at it. Having > a specs file in this location does absolutely nothing. > > -- > JH
Thank you! Time to start over and see if I can do it right. Things are definitely not in the right place. Oh well. At least I am learning. -- Stealth -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
