Em Tuesday 30 September 2008 11:04:06 Valter Douglas Lisbôa Jr. escreveu: > Em Monday 29 September 2008 09:47:35 Jeremy Henty escreveu: > > Replying to myself, > > > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 09:07:28AM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote: > > > I've noticed a change in the behaviour of useradd when upgrading LFS > > > from 6.1.1 to 6.3: "useradd foo" now creates a default group "foo" > > > and makes it the primary group of user "foo". It this meant to > > > happen or have I messed something up? > > > > I've just noticed that shadow-4.0.18.1-useradd_fix-2.patch seems to be > > responsible for this. Is that right? If so then it does a lot more > > than it says on the tin! > > > > Regards, > > > > Jeremy Henty > > I try to find by man, but it's poorly documented, I did think for a while > that /etc/defaults/useradd could change this behaviour, but no. My file > have GROUP=100 and 100 is the GID of group users and it always create a new > group if the -u is nor expecified. > > I try a strings on /usr/sbin/useradd searching a possible parameter > on /etc/login.defs, but no clear hint how to change it by this way. Going > to source code... > > -- > Valter Douglas Lisbôa Jr. > Sócio-Diretor > Trenix - IT Solutions > "Nossas Idéias, suas Soluções!" > www.trenix.com.br > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The patch completelly ignore the GROUP= on /etc/defaults/useradd, to be truth, almost the whole patch code is about ignore this and does not have any options to change the behaviour, neither in /etc/login.defs. -- Valter Douglas Lisbôa Jr. Sócio-Diretor Trenix - IT Solutions "Nossas Idéias, suas Soluções!" www.trenix.com.br [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
