Baho Utot wrote: > > On 12/29/2013 05:54 AM, akhiezer wrote: >>> Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 10:15:22 +0100 >>> From: Pierre Labastie <pierre.labas...@neuf.fr> >>> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist <lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org> >>> Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] xz instructions from chapter 6 >>> >>> Le 28/12/2013 22:20, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : >>>> Aleksey Rybalkin wrote: >>>>> Hi. >>>>> >>>>> xz instructions from chapter 6 leave broken symlink /usr/bin/lzcat >>>>> which points to "xz" but /usr/bin/xz does not exist since it was moved >>>>> to /bin >>>>> I suppose lzcat should be moved to /bin too. >>>> That's right. I've got it in my queue to update svn. I suppose an >>>> errata entry is appropriate.
>>> Why an erratum? For 7.4, all the executables were installed in /usr/bin >>> anyway. >> I think they're saying that '/usr/bin/lzcat -> xz' becomes a dangling symlnk >> after 'mv /usr/bin/xz /bin/xz' ? > Not in 7.4 the executables are all in /usr/bin none are moved Pierre and Baho are right. 7.4 does not need the erratum. I hadn't added it because I haven't had a chance to check 7.4 with the visitors I've had for the holidays. Generally, I'm concerned with the svn version and don't check stable very often. I rely on reports for that. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
