Matt Burgess wrote: > On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 19:17 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> In the glibc build procedures, a simple sed to the glibc code seems to >> fix the problem: >> >> sed -i -e 's/static __m128i/inline &/' sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/strstr.c >> >> I am proposing that we add this to both Chapter 5 and Chapter 6 of LFS. >> I'm not sure if we need to do an -rc2 or not. > > I don't have a problem with that sed. I realise that upstream doesn't > think it's the correct fix, more of a workaround, but we've quite often > used simple workarounds until a 'proper' upstream fix has been made > available. > > I think an -rc2 would be prudent; the sed is admittedly very simple and > I can't see how it could cause untoward issues, but as it's in Glibc > then it's worth being a little cautious I think.
OK, I'll do a -rc2 today. I think it best to slip the stable release to September 7. Should we update to the newer gettext, kbd, and/or kmod at the same time? Those all seem to have lower potential for problems than the glibc sed. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
