Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >>> Can give some useful info, anyway, I think, and will be glad to. >>> >>> However is it relevant, after Armin's comment? >> >> No, I think not, but it would be interesting to check if kmod-14 builds >> (just though make) using 4.5.3 and 4.6.2 > > OK. Both logs, below. > > In all with gcc-4.5.3:
> tools/static-nodes.c: In function 'help': > tools/static-nodes.c:146:2: warning: implicit declaration of function > '_Static_assert' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > tools/static-nodes.c:146:2: warning: nested extern declaration of > '_Static_assert' [-Wnested-externs] > CCLD tools/kmod > tools/kmod.o: In function `kmod_help': > /home/fernando/tmp/kmod-14/tools/kmod.c:64: undefined reference to > `_Static_assert' > /home/fernando/tmp/kmod-14/tools/kmod.c:64: undefined reference to > `_Static_assert' > /home/fernando/tmp/kmod-14/tools/kmod.c:73: undefined reference to > `_Static_assert' > /home/fernando/tmp/kmod-14/tools/kmod.c:73: undefined reference to > `_Static_assert' > tools/kmod.o: In function `handle_kmod_compat_commands': > /home/fernando/tmp/kmod-14/tools/kmod.c:151: undefined reference to > `_Static_assert' > tools/kmod.o:/home/fernando/tmp/kmod-14/tools/kmod.c:151: more undefined > references to `_Static_assert' follow > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make[2]: *** [tools/kmod] Error 1 > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make: *** [all] Error 2 > }} > > With gcc-4.6.2: > make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. > }} Thanks. Good info to know. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
