Matt Burgess wrote: > On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 15:36 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> I'd still prefer something along the line of "Hey, this package builds >> something we really don't need here, but breaks the build because it has >> not caught up with newer tools. We'll just skip that here and fix it >> properly in Chapter 6." > > Well, I don't think this is worth arguing over any more, as I don't > think we're going to convince each other. If you really want to go and > disable it again, I won't revert your revert of my revert (of your > original commit) :-)
It's not that big a deal. Maybe next time. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
