On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:45:36 +0000, lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There appears to be no entry for 'Libpipeline' on the 'Rationale ...' page
> ('.../prologue/package-choices...') in the lfs book, for lfs versions
> SVN-20130211, 7.2, 7.1, and 7.0 .
>
> If a package is deemed 'important' and/or 'core' enough to be included in
> lfs,
> then ipso facto shouldn't there be a rationale - and hence entry on said
> page -
> for it?
Yes, there should be. Looks like we missed that. Its rationale is simply
that it is required for man-db. I'll address this shortly.
Thanks for the report,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
