On 11/30/2012 6:14 PM, g....@free.fr wrote: > > > ----- Mail original ----- >> De: "Wolf" <lailavrazda1...@gmail.com> >> À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" <lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org> >> Envoyé: Vendredi 30 Novembre 2012 23:29:03 >> Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] BLFS & Freetype patents > >> >> On 11/30/2012 4:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Wolf wrote: >>>> Is the sed command in BLFS still necessary for subpixel rendering? >>>> The link given, http://www.freetype.org/patents.html says that all the >>>> patents have expired, and that the functionality has been enabled >>>> by default since version 2.4. >>> >>> If you look at the code, FT_CONFIG_OPTION_SUBPIXEL_RENDERING is still >>> commented out in include/freetype/config/ftoption.h. That definition is >>> still used in src/smooth/ftsmooth.c and src/base/ftlcdfil.c. >>> >>> -- Bruce >>> >> Oh, sounds like an oversight in freetype, then. >> >> > No > Using diff -ur freetype-2.3.12/include/freetype/config/ftoption.h > freetype-2.4.10/include/freetype/config/ftoption.h | grep BYTE > would show you that you mixed the bytecode hinting feature > (TT_CONFIG_OPTION_BYTECODE_INTERPRETER selected by default since 2.4) with > the subpixel rendering setting (TT_CONFIG_OPTION_BYTECODE_INTERPRETER, not > selected by default in 2.4) > > Some patents expire in 2019 according to wikipedia > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subpixel_rendering > > Gilles > Oh, I see. Never mind, then.
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
